External A was a 2 TB internal drive in an enclosure, and external C was a 750 GB store-bought drive. All of the drives I ran this test on were 7200 RPM hard drives and had a cache of 8 MB. Why did I decide to do that? Well, there are quite a few factors to this test, including hard drive speeds. The 24 GB folder was a portion of my music collection, mostly. The 4.4GB file I used was my Wii disc backup of Donkey Kong Country Returns. The external drives were ejected and the system was rebooted between testing each program. This was done in order for each of the copying methods. And lastly, copied that folder from my internal drive to external C. Then, I copied a 24 GB folder (3300 files, with an average size of about 8 MB) from external A to my internal drive, B. Then, I copied that file to another external hard drive, C. First, I copied a file of 4.4 GB from one external hard drive, A, to my internal one, B. For me it was simply creating chaos instead of helpingīut the two things I liked about it in it was the fact that separate tasks were now held together and that tasks could be resumed later on, even after the reset.In order to test fairly, I ran four distinct copy actions with each program and with the default Windows 7 copy function. It is uninformative, hard to read, buggy, and takes too much space on the screen, obscuring the view. And went back to the old one after about 2 weeksīecause in my experience, the Third version sucks. And with TeraCopy I went from 2.3 to 3.26. I recently went from Windows 7 to Windows 10 and during the transition acquired the newest versions of various software that I use. But on a side note: which versions are you using? There have been some talk about integrating TC more into FC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |